Regardless of origin, the identity of those involved or their level of culpability, Covid-19 was an ‘attack’ on the United States and the world. President Trump said it was an attack worse than Pearl Harbor and 9/11, so in other words, we are at “war,” – 5th generation [unconventional] warfare.
I’m honored to be the only Congressional 3rd (TX-03) candidate mentioned in Jackie Schlegel’s TEXANS for Vaccine Choice Voter Guide. I’ll fight back against unconstitutional Anthony Fauci, Let’s Go Brandon swamp bioweapons. WE WILL NOT COMPLY. I have ZERO ties to Washington D.C., the lamestream media, or BigPharma.
Regardless, WE DO NOT suspend, CANCEL, or “pause” the U.S. Constitution and our unalienable rights, nor do we suspend or right to Life, Liberty, and pursuit of Happiness during a declared ‘emergency’ or a ‘pandemic.’ When this began, I was subject to pineal gland temperature checks and electronic “well-for-work” declarations upon arriving at work. Fellow employees would take my temperature and I would voice my displeasure about where this all headed. I agreed to temperature checks, but MASKS – which affect my health and that of others, were the proverbial “line in the sand.” I was shunned, ridiculed, mocked, alienated for taking a stand. “Your rights?!” colleagues asked.
Yes, if you don’t have your health or your freedom – WE HAVE NO RIGHTS.
The American Revolutionary War was fought during a smallpox pandemic which killed an estimated 130,000 colonists. The U.S. Constitution was written during a time like this and especially FOR times like this. Can you imagine if General George Washington ordered the Continental Army to “mask-up,” “stay-at-home,” “stay 6 feet apart,” “mask up inside your own home,” waiting for the British to arrive and punish them for treason?
In the current era, Masks, PCR, and the injections are all Emergency Use Authorized. Emergency Use Authorization (“EUA”) is an authorization by the FDA under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (Title 21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3) whereby certain unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products may nonetheless be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by biologic, chemical, or nuclear agents when there are no adequate approved and available alternatives.
The masks, PCR, and shots are unapproved, the risks are unknown, and the recipient has the option to accept or refuse. This is known as “Informed Consent.” Though President Trump advocates for the shots and mentions boosters, he still says, “you have a choice” and “you still have your freedoms.” This originates back to the Nuremberg Code, which originated from the Nuremberg Tribunals of Nazi war criminals. This was a series of 11 or so tribunals. The case involving Nazi medical doctors was “United States v. Karl Brandt, et al.”
At last check, social media has suggested Congressional members, as well as bureaucratic 3-letter agencies are exempt from taking the injections. No job is worth the jab, and no jab is worth the risks on my life. I’m willing to lose it all to remain free.
Ivanovskis on The Issues
The Nuremberg Code
- The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
- The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
- The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
- The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
- The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
- No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
- The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
- Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
- The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
- During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
- During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
[“Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10”, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.]
We need to refuse any and all efforts to mandate CV19 injections, which includes objecting to the fake “choice,” of being voluntary in lieu of the draconian restrictions for those who refuse.
Medical and religious exemptions will be insufficient to overcome the illegality of EUA vaccine mandates. ~RFK, Jr.
As a flight attendant, I am considered a “federal contractor” under Biden E.O. #14042 and I am told that I need to submit “proof of vaccination” or submit a ‘religious or medical exemption,’ by a specified date, just to stay employed. Under existing Federal Law, I don’t need an exemption for something that I already have a “right to accept or refuse.
As Congressman, representing the great people of TX-03, I will work with interested parties to resurrect and fully support H.R.s 2317 and 3860. I would also work closely with other House members to sponsor legislation to remove Dr. Fauci from his position at the NIH.
Can Employers Require You To Take the COVID Injection?
Police Officers Speaking Up
Support Our Campaign
Get Out and Vote
If we join together and make our voices heard, we can fight for the change we want to see in Congressional 3rd District (TX-03).